Ricombinante E. coli RuvB proteinaa (Funzionale) (A459)

The Escherichia coli RuvB protein is a motor protein that forms a complex with RuvA and promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions during homologous recombination. This study describes the characteristics of two RuvB mutants, I148T and I150T, that do not promote branch migration in the presence of RuvA. These RuvB mutants hydrolyzed ATP and bound duplex DNA with the same efficiency as wild-type RuvB, but the mutants did not form a complex with RuvA and were defective in loading onto junction DNA in a RuvA-assisted manner. A recent crystallographic study revealed that Ile(148) and Ile(150) are in a unique beta-hairpin that protrudes from the AAA(+) ATPase domain of RuvB. We propose that this beta-hairpin interacts with hydrophobic residues in the mobile third domain of RuvA and that this interaction is vital for the RuvA-assisted loading of RuvB onto Holliday junction DNA.

Escherichia coli RuvB protein, an ATP-dependent hexameric DNA helicase, acts together with RuvA protein to promote branch migration of Holliday junctions during homologous recombination and recombinational repair. To elucidate the role of the Walker motif A of RuvB (GXGKT; X indicates a nonconserved residue) in ATP hydrolysis and branch migration activities, we constructed four ruvB mutant genes by site-directed mutagenesis, altering the highly conserved Lys(68) and Thr(69). K68R, K68A, and T69A mutants except T69S failed to complement UV-sensitive phenotype of the ruvB strain. These three mutant proteins, when overexpressed, made the wild-type strain UV-sensitive to varying degrees. K68R, K68A, and T69A were defective in ATP hydrolysis and branch migration activities in vitro. In the presence of Mg(2+), K68R showed markedly reduced affinity for ATP, while K68A and T69A showed only mild reduction. K68A and T69A could form hexamers in the presence of Mg(2+) and ATP, while K68R failed to form hexamers and existed instead as a higher oligomer, probably a dodecamer. In contrast to wild-type RuvB, K68R, K68A, and T69A by themselves were defective in DNA binding. However, RuvA could facilitate binding of K68A and T69A to DNA, whereas it could not promote binding of K68R to DNA. All of the three mutant RuvBs could physically interact with RuvA. These results indicate the direct involvement in ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis of the invariant Lys(68) and Thr(69) residues of Walker motif A of RuvB and suggest that these residues play key roles in interrelating these activities with the conformational change of RuvB, which is required for the branch migration activity.

The Holliday junction is a well-known intermediate of homologous recombination. Recently, the proteins involved in the correct processing of the Holliday structure into mature recombinant molecules, namely RuvA, RuvB, RuvC and RecG have been isolated and characterized. This has culminated in a model for their synergistic mechanism of action and the solving of the RuvC crystal structure.

The Escherichia coli ruvA and ruvB genes are involved in DNA repair and in the late step of homologous genetic recombination. We have demonstrated previously that the RuvA-RuvB protein complex in the presence of ATP promotes reabsorption of cruciform structures extruded from a supercoiled plasmid with an inverted repeat sequence. Because the cruciform structure is topologically analogous to the Holiday structure, we have proposed that the role of the RuvA and RuvB proteins in recombination is to promote a strand exchange reaction at the Holliday junction. Here, we studied the specific interaction of the RuvA-RuvB complex with the Holliday structure using synthetic analogs prepared by annealing four oligonucleotides. The affinities of the RuvA protein for synthetic Holliday junctions are much higher (> 20-fold) than for duplex DNA, and the affinities of the RuvA protein for the junctions are further enhanced (> 4-fold) by the interaction with the RuvB protein. The RuvA-RuvB protein complex in the presence of ATP promotes dissociation of the synthetic Holliday junction with homology in the central core into two halves by catalyzing branch migration to the DNA ends, but it does not affect the structure of the synthetic Holliday junction without the homology. The separation of the synthetic Holliday junction is a result of the activity of the RuvA-RuvB complex that promotes strand exchange and DNA unwinding. Furthermore, RuvA and RuvB promote the strand exchange reaction at the Holliday junctions made by RecA. These results provide further evidence that the RuvA-RuvB complex recognizes the Holliday junction and promotes branch migration in homologous recombination.