Anti-HLA G Antibody [MEM-G/1] (Biotin) (A86279)

HLA-G is a nonclassical class I MHC molecule with an unknown function and with unusual characteristics that distinguish it from other class I MHC molecules. Here, we demonstrate that HLA-G forms disulfide-linked dimers that are present on the cell surface. Immunoprecipitation of HLA-G from surface biotinylated transfectants using the anti-beta2-microglobulin mAb BBM.1 revealed the presence of an approximately equal 78-kDa form of HLA-G heavy chain that was reduced by using DTT to a 39-kDa form. Mutation of Cys-42 to a serine completely abrogated dimerization of HLA-G, suggesting that the disulfide linkage formed exclusively through this residue. A possible interaction between the HLA-G monomer or dimer and the KIR2DL4 receptor was also investigated, but no interaction between these molecules could be detected through several approaches. The cell-surface expression of dimerized HLA-G molecules may have implications for HLA-Greceptor interactions and for the search for specific receptors that bind HLA-G.

HLA-G is an effective ligand of natural killer (NK) inhibitory receptors, HLA-G transcripts have been detected in several human tumors, and cytokines like gamma interferon (IFN) enable HLA-G molecules to be expressed. These findings are particularly upsetting in case of melanomas: IFN treatment is frequently included in melanoma therapeutic protocols, and downregulation of classical class I molecules occurs in nearly half of these tumors. Therefore, a melanoma cell downregulating classical class I and de novo expressing HLA-G, either constitutively or upon IFN treatment, is probably a stealthy target for the immune system, having inhibited both the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and the NK activity. To elucidate this point we have investigated the expression of HLA-G molecules in 45 melanoma cell lines before and after gammaIFN treatment. Analysis was performed by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, using the anti-HLA-G MoAbs 87G and G233, by Western blot, using the anti-HLA-G MEM/G1 MoAb and PAG1 antiserum, and by RT-PCR analysis. In addition, 8 melanoma tissues from patients free from therapy and 6 nevi were studied by immunohistochemistry using the 87G MoAb. No evidence was gathered of HLA-G expression, neither constitutive nor, in cell lines, after gammaIFN treatment. We therefore conclude that HLA-G expression is an uncommon event in melanomas, and that a therapy including IFNs cannot harm the patient by inducing the de novo expression of HLA-G molecules at least in its G1 isoform.