Unconjugated
Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum) is one of the most commonly used agents for the chemotherapy of various types of cancers, but its use is limited by its dose-dependent side-effects (e.g., nephrotoxicity). The ELR-CXC chemokines are potent tumor growth, metastatic and angiogenic factors and can foster tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. They are also potent proinflammatory agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the added effects of combining cisplatin chemotherapy with ELR-CXC chemokine antagonism in a mouse H22 hepatoma cancer cell model. The mice were injected with tumor cells and were then treated with cisplatin (12.5 or 2 mg/kg doses), either alone or together with the chemokine antagonist CXCL8(3-72)K11R/G31P (G31P) (50 µg/kg). At varying time-points renal function was examined using blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (SCr) as read-outs for the toxic effects of cisplatin, while tumor growth and metastasis were assessed as endpoints. High-dose cisplatin therapy reduced the tumor burden by 52%, while co-delivery of G31P further augmented the tumor growth-suppressive effects of this dose of cisplatin to 71%; G31P by itself and low-dose cisplatin reduced the tumor burden by 19 and 39%, respectively. G31P also reduced the nephrotoxic effects of high-dose cisplatin to the effects observed in the low-dose cisplatin-treated animals. These data confirm the beneficial effects of combined cisplatin chemotherapy and ELR-CXC chemokine anatagonism in the context of both tumor progression and adverse side-effects.
BACKGROUND:
The sensitivity in cytology diagnosis of malignant metastatic pleural effusion (MMPE) is insufficient nowadays due to the similarity of the reactive mesothelial cells and malignant cells. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the key factors in tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the value of VEGF and its homologs in the aid of MMPE diagnosis.
METHODS:
A total of 217 pleural effusions samples were eligible for analysis. Among them, 81 malignant and 22 benign cases were made into the cell blocks for the immunocytochemical (ICC) staining of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3 expression. Another 114 samples (41 malignant and 73 benign cases) were subjected to the ELISA test for the protein level of VEGF-D.
RESULTS:
In a total of 156 MMPE, only VEGF-D expression by ICC stain was significantly different between malignant (92.6%) and benign cases (9.1%) with P<0.001 in either nuclear or cytoplasmic staining. Only 6 malignant cases showed negative stain results. In addition, 3 of the 4 lung small cell carcinoma were immunoreactive for VEGF-D. However, some lymphocytes also showed nuclear staining pattern of VEGF-D. In contrast, the ELISA test for the VEGF-D protein levels failed to demonstrate the difference between malignant and benign pleural effusions.
CONCLUSIONS:
Among VEGF homologs, MMPE from various kinds of tumor origin, VEGF-D showed 92.6% rate of positive expression. ICC stain of VEGF-D is a useful marker in the aid of MMPE diagnosis.